CRITERION -2 – VIVEKANANDA COLLEGE OF LAW

Criteria 2- Teaching- Learning and Evaluation (350)

Metric No.

Key Indicator- 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (40)

Relevant Proofs

2.1.1.

Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years)

View

2.1.2.

Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years

View

Metric No.

Key Indicator- 2.2. Catering to Student Diversity (50)

Relevant Proofs

2.2.1.

The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes/ have policies in place for different levels of learners

View

2.2.2.

Student- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)

View

Metric No.

Key Indicator- 2.3. Teaching- Learning Process (50)

Relevant Proofs

2.3.1

Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning peer learning, team teaching, case law method and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences

View

2.3.2.

Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process.

View

2.3.3

Ratio of faculty mentor to students for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year )

View

2.3.4

Ratio of Student to students mentoring for academic and other related issues (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year)

View

Metric No.

Key Indicator- 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (60)

Relevant Proofs

2.4.1.

Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years

View

2.4.2.

Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / LL.D during the last five years

View

2.4.3.

Average teaching experience of full time teachers (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years)

View

2.4.4

Measures taken by the institution for faculty retention

View

Metric No.

Key Indicator- 2.5. Evaluation Process and Reforms (30)

Relevant Proofs

2.5.1

Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency , mode and innovation introduced in the internal evaluation

View

2.5.2.

Mechanism to deal with internal examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient

View

Metric No.

Key Indicator- 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (60)

Relevant Proofs

2.6.1.

Teachers and students are aware of the stated Programme and course outcomes of the Programmes offered by the institution.

View

2.6.2.

Attainment of Programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution.

View

2.6.3.

Average pass percentage of Students during last five years

View

Metric No.

Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (60)

Relevant Proofs

2.7.1.

Online student satisfaction survey regarding to teaching learning process.

View

Admission Enquiry

Click

X